LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
ACUTE PORPHYRIAS
I. DIAGNOSIS OF THE ACUTE ATTACK
Background information
|
|
Acute neurovisceral attacks are accompanied by increased urinary excretion of PBG and, to a lesser extent, ALA, except in the exceedingly rare condition, ADP (more about porphyrias), where PBG excretion is normal. |
|
|
Examination of urine for excess PBG is, therefore, the essential investigation in patients with a suspected attack of acute porphyria. |
||
|
Measurement of urinary porphyrin by itself is unhelpful and may be misleading. Though concentrations are usually increased in acute porphyria, mainly due to in vitro polymerization of PBG to uroporphyrin, increases also occur in hepatobiliary disease, alcohol abuse, infections and other common disorders. In lead poisoning and ADP, coproporphyrin III and ALA, but usually not PBG, are increased. |
Specimen collection and stability
|
Urinary PBG is best analysed in a fresh, random sample (10-20 mL) collected without any preservative but protected from light. |
||
|
24 hour collections delay diagnosis and increase the risk of losses during the collection period. |
||
|
PBG is stable in urine in the dark at 4°C for up to 48 hours and for at least a month at -20°C. |
Analytical procedures
|
The preferred method for measurement of PBG in urine is quantification of the red product formed by its reaction with 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in acid (Ehrlich’s reagent) after removal of urobilinogen and other interfering substances by anion exchange chromatography (more information). A commercial kit is available from BioRad Laboratories (Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK, www.bio-rad.com). Results should be expressed as µmol/mmol creatinine. |
||
|
A more rapid semi-quantitative variation of the above method (Trace PBG kit) (more information) is available from Alpha Laboratories, Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK, for initial screening of urine for excess PBG. |
||
|
Qualitative screening tests in which the PBG-Ehrlich compound is separated from the urobilinogen-Ehrlich complex by solvent extraction have also been described (more information). |
||
|
Whichever method is used, a normal urine sample and a quality control sample containing excess PBG should be included in every batch. Quality control material is not commercially available but can be prepared as described (more information). |
||
|
All laboratories undertaking qualitative or quantitative determination of urinary PBG should participate regularly in an appropriate EQA scheme. |
Comments
|
Interpretation
|
Normal adult urine contains < 1.5 µmol PBG/mmol creatinine ( < 10 µmol/L). |
||
|
In most patients with an attack of acute porphyria, PBG concentrations are at least ten times the upper limit of normal within one week of the onset of symptoms. At these concentrations urine samples may develop a brownish red colour on standing, or urine may be this colour when fresh, but this discolouration, which is produced by condensation of PBG to porphobilin, porphyrin and other compounds, is variable and not always observed. |
||
|
The detection limits for the Trace kit method and for one of the qualitative solvent-extraction methods (more information) are 25 µmol/L and about 50 µmol/L respectively. Most patients with an attack of acute porphyria excrete much more than this and their urine should give a positive screening test. |
||
|
PBG excretion decreases as the attack resolves. In AIP, excretion usually remains increased for many weeks but in VP and HCP may return to normal or near normal within a week or so after the onset of symptoms. |
||
|
If screening tests are negative and clinical suspicion of porphyria persists, it is essential to quantify urinary PBG and ALA, using a specific method (more about porphyria specialist centres) and analyse plasma and faecal porphyrins. |
||
|
If urinary PBG and ALA, plasma porphyrin concentration and faecal coproporphyrin III excretion is normal, acute porphyria is excluded as the cause of current symptoms. Enzyme measurements are not necessary for exclusion of porphyria as the cause of an acute illness and may give misleading information. |
||
|
In an individual known to have inherited one of the acute porphyrias, normal PBG/ALA excretion excludes an acute attack. However, because PBG excretion may be persistently raised in clinically latent porphyria or during remission, and the further increase that accompanies an acute attack is often difficult to demonstrate, attribution of symptoms to acute porphyria in such individuals depends largely on clinical assessment. |
II. DIAGNOSIS OF THE TYPE OF ACUTE PORPHYRIA
A) WHEN SYMPTOMS ARE PRESENT
|
As soon as a diagnosis of acute porphyria has been established, it is essential to identify the type of acute porphyria in order to provide appropriate advice for the patient and their family. Even when the patient comes from a family known to have a particular type of porphyria, the type of porphyria should be confirmed. Examples of two inherited porphyrias in the same family have been reported. |
||||||||
|
Metabolite measurements (urinary PBG/ALA, faecal and plasma porphyrins) are essential for the diagnosis of clinically overt acute porphyrias because symptoms cannot be ascribed to porphyria unless specific patterns of overproduction of porphyrin precursors/porphyrins are demonstrated. Enzyme measurements are not essential and may mislead due to overlap between normal and disease ranges. |
||||||||
|
This section proposes minimum diagnostic criteria that must be met in order to establish the diagnosis of the type of porphyria when symptoms due to porphyria are present.
|
1- Specimen collection and stability
|
Urine: see above. |
||
|
About 5-10g wet weight of faeces is adequate for porphyrin analysis. Diagnostically significant changes in porphyrin concentration are unlikely to occur within 36 hours at room temperature, allowing samples to be mailed to a reference laboratory. |
||
|
For plasma porphyrin analysis, 5mL EDTA-anticoagulated blood is recommended. Plasma should be separated within 24 hours as soon as practicable to avoid contamination with sufficient haemoglobin to interfere with porphyrin analysis. Transfer of the unseparated sample to the reference laboratory is recommended to allow additional analyses that may be required eg DNA analysis, erythrocyte porphyrin, PBG deaminase. |
2– Diagnostic criteria
2.1- Acute Intermittent Porphyria (AIP)
Increased urinary PBG excretion, with normal or near normal faecal porphyrin concentration (but see comment 3 below).
Note: Plasma fluorescence emission spectroscopy is useful as a front line test in all acute porphyrias because a peak at 624-627nm establishes the diagnosis of VP. It does not distinguish AIP from HCP; in both conditions, an emission peak at 620 nm may be present. The absence of a peak at 624-627nm excludes VP.
Comments
|
2.2– Variegate Porphyria (VP)
2.2.1- Acute neurovisceral attack +/- skin lesions
Increased urinary PBG excretion, with a plasma porphyrin fluorescence emission peak at 624-627nm. If plasma porphyrin fluorescence spectroscopy is not available or further confirmation is required, faecal porphyrin analysis shows increased protoporphyrin and, to a lesser extent, coproporphyrin concentrations with coproporphyrin III/I ratio greater than 2.0.
2.2.2- Skin lesions alone
As above, except that urinary PBG excretion is often only slightly increased or normal.
Note: urinary coproporphyrin III excretion is increased during acute and cutaneous phases but urinary analysis alone is not sufficient to establish or exclude the diagnosis of VP unequivocally.
Comments
|
2.3– Hereditary Coproporphyria (HCP)
Increased urinary PBG excretion, with total faecal porphyrin concentration greater than 200 nmol/g dry wt. with coproporphyrin as the main component and a coproporphyrin III/I ratio greater than 2.0.
Note: presentation with skin lesions alone is rare and often provoked by cholestasis. Such patients have markedly increased urinary coproporphyrin III excretion +/- increased PBG excretion and a plasma porphyrin fluorescence emission peak at about 620nm. Faecal coproporphrin III/I ratios are greater than 2.0 but, if cholestasis is severe, the coproporphyrin concentration may not be sufficiently increased to raise the total faecal porphyrin concentration.
Comments
|
2.4– ALA Dehydrase Deficiency Porphyria (ADP)
Urinary ALA excretion greater than 72 µmol/mmol creatinine and greatly in excess of PBG excretion. Coproporphyrin III greater than 250 nmol/mmol. Normal blood lead concentration. ALAD activity decreased by more than 80% and not restored by thiol reagents.
Comments
|
B) DIAGNOSIS DURING REMISSION
|
This section proposes a strategy for the diagnosis of the autosomal dominant acute porphyrias in patients, over the age of 15 years, who present for investigation:
|
||||||||
|
Diagnosis may be difficult because:
|
Initial investigations
In all patients, determine:
| 1 |
urinary PBG and ALA excretion |
|
| 2 |
faecal protoporphyrin, coproporphyrin and coproporphyrin III/I isomer ratio |
|
| 3 |
plasma porphyrin fluorescence emission spectrum |
|
| 4 |
erythrocyte PBG deaminase activity if routine haematology is normal. |
Interpretation and further investigation
|
If one or more of tests 1-3 is abnormal, porphyria is confirmed (more about diagnostic criteria). |
|||||||||||
|
If metabolite tests 1-3 are normal, any current or recent symptoms are not caused by porphyria and an alternative cause of the symptoms should be sort. |
|||||||||||
|
If only test 4 is abnormal, mutational analysis of the HMBS gene is required. If a disease-specific mutation is identified, AIP in remission (or latent if asymptomatic with family history) is confirmed. Current data indicates that mutational analysis of the HMBS gene is 95% sensitive and 100% specific, provided disease-specific missense mutations are distinguished from rare polymorphisms. |
|||||||||||
|
If all four tests are normal, one or more of the following should be undertaken:
|
Comments
|
Exclusion of autosomal dominant acute porphyria
|
There is no test or group of tests that can exclude an acute porphyria with absolute certainty unless the mutation that causes porphyria in the family of the patient under investigation is known. |
|||||||||||
|
When the family mutation is unknown, it is recommended that the maximum probability of having porphyria is estimated. |
|||||||||||
|
Estimation of the probability requires knowledge of:
|
III. REFERENCES
1. Mauzerall D, Granick S.
The occurrence and determination of d-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen in urine.
J Biol Chem 1956;219:435-46.
2. Deacon AC, Peters TJ.
Identification of acute porphyria:evaluation of a commercial screening test for urinary porphobilinogen. Ann Clin Biochem1998;35:726-32.
3. Deacon AC, Elder GH.
Front line tests for the investigation of suspected porphyria. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:500-507.
4. Buttery JE, Carrera AM, Panall PR.
Reliability of the porphobilinogen screening assay. Pathology 1990; 22:197-8.
5. Buttery JE, Carrera AM, Panall PR.
Analytical sensitivity and specificity of two screening methods for urinary porphobilinogen.
Ann Clin Biochem 1990;27:165-6.
6. Kauppinen R, Fraunberg M.
Molecular and biochemical studies of acute intermittent porphyria in 196 patients and their families. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 1891-1900.
7. Rossi E.
Increased faecal porphyrins in acute intermittent porphyria. Clin Chem 1999;45:281-3.
8. Lockwood WH, Poulos V, Rossi E et al.
Rapid procedure for faecal porphyrin assay. Clin Chem 1985; 31: 1163-7.
9. Mustajoki P, Kauppinen R, Lannfelt L et al.
Frequency of low erythrocyte porphobilinogen deaminase activity in Finland.
J Int Med 1992; 231: 389-95.
10. Nordmann Y, Puy H, Da Silva V et al.
Acute intermittent porphyria:prevalence of mutations in the porphobilinogen deaminase gene in blood donors in France. J Int Med 1997; 242: 213-217.
11. Blake D, McManus J, Cronin V et al.
Fecal coproporphyrin isomers in hereditary coproporphria. Clin Chem 1992; 38: 96-100.
12. Jacob K, Doss M.
Excretion pattern of faecal coproporphyrin isomers I-IV in human porphyrias.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33: 893-901.
13. Sassa S.
ALAD porphyria. Seminars in Liver Disease 1998; 18: 95-101.
14. Long C, Smyth SJ, Woolf J et al.
The detection of latent porphyria by fluorescence emission spectroscopy of plasma.
Br J Dermatol 1993; 129: 9-13.
NON-ACUTE PORPHYRIAS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
|

